• Work
  • Insta
  • About
  • Connect
  • Musings

jason machinski

  • Work
  • Insta
  • About
  • Connect
  • Musings

New Generation Photography Award Talk

Fig. 1. Meryl McMaster, Deanna Pizzitelli and Elisa Julia Gilmour (Source: National Gallery Of Canada, 2018).

Fig. 1. Meryl McMaster, Deanna Pizzitelli and Elisa Julia Gilmour (Source: National Gallery Of Canada, 2018).

On May 3 I attended the Scotiabank New Generation Photography Award Exhibition & Talk at the National Gallery of Canada. This exhibtion and talk showcased the work of emerging artists, aged 30 and under, who create lens-based photographic work in Canada (National Gallery of Canada, 2018).  It was great to see three contemporaries working within the same medium but with such vaired approaches. I will be reviewing the work of Meryl McMaster and Deanna Pizzitelli in this post as their work presented within the show focused more on photography.  

Deanna Pizzitelli's work Unititled (Nothing, Nothing), to the left in Fig. 2 below, explores the aesthetics of decay and loss, she used degraded decaying photographic prints as a metaphor for human emotion and experience, the prints and subjects are united by loss and decay, Pizzitelli (2018).  I found her approach very interesting as she consciously considered the print within the work itself, too often the print is not thought of as an active piece in the creation of a work.  The images are, yellowed faded and worn, their loss of detail is a great reinforcer of the loss felt by the people within the images. 

Meryl McMaster's work deals with how our sense of self helps shape our identity, and how we construct our sense of self, McMaster (2018).  Her work like Cindy Sherman’s is all self-portraits, like Sherman McMaster takes on many personas making it hard to define who she really is through her work.  

A sense of place is also very important to her work, she explores her Indigenous heritage in many of her works, the image included in this show, Edge of a Moment, 2017, is a self portrait of the artist at a culturally important ancestral site: Head-Smashed-In Buffalo Jump in Alberta (National Gallery of Canada, 2018).  She explains the outfit in the talk and its multiple layer of visual signifiers representing her heritage.  Her work is very multilayered and her process to create her outfits is quite amazing.  I also like that she uses her gaze to confront the viewer in almost all of her photographs, the subject's gaze is something I would like to incorporate in my work.  The size of the print is also very impressive and stands in good contrast to Pizzitelli’s smaller work. 

This artist talk showcased to me the methodology and process that goes into creating photographic works of art of this caliber, it was a real eye opener and got me thinking more about each stage of the photographic process, the research, planning, production and display phases and how they all can be utilized to say something about your work.

 

 

Fig. 2. PhotoLab 4: New Generation Photography Award Exhibition (Source: National Gallery Of Canada PhotoLab 4, 2018).

Fig. 2. PhotoLab 4: New Generation Photography Award Exhibition (Source: National Gallery Of Canada PhotoLab 4, 2018).

On a side note Meryl McMaster, who is from Ottawa, I connected with her after the talk we discussed her work and I asked if she would be interested in speaking to my History of Photography class, she said was interested very exciting!!

Citations 

Pizzitelli, D. (2018) New Generation Photography Award Talk NGC. 3 May, 2018

McMaster, M. (2018) New Generation Photography Award Talk NGC. 3 May, 2018.

National Gallery Of Canada PhotoLab 4 (2018) PhotoLab 4: New Generation Photography Award Exhibition [Online Image]. Available at https://www.gallery.ca/whats-on/exhibitions-and-galleries/photolab-4-new-generation-photography-award-exhibitio [Accessed: 7 May, 2018].

National Gallery Of Canada (2018) Young Champions: Emerging Artists in Contemporary Photography [Online Image]. Available at: https://www.gallery.ca/magazine/exhibitions/young-champions-emerging-artists-in-contemporary-photography [Accessed: 7 May, 2018].

National Gallery Of Canada (2018) Young Champions: Emerging Artists in Contemporary Photography. Available at: https://www.gallery.ca/magazine/exhibitions/young-champions-emerging-artists-in-contemporary-photography [Accessed: 7 May, 2018].

tags: Research and Practice
categories: Masters, National Gallery Talk
Monday 05.07.18
Posted by Jason Machinski
 

Indigenous Self-Representation In Photography

Figure 1: Dayna Danger discussing work of Shelley Niro (Source: Machinski, 2018).

Figure 1: Dayna Danger discussing work of Shelley Niro (Source: Machinski, 2018).

On Thursday I attended the Indigenous Self-Representation in Photography talk at the National Gallery of Canada.  The speakers were Dayna Danger and Sophie Guignard.  Danger is a two-spirit Métis-Anishinaabe artist and Guignard is a PhD candidate in Art History.  It was a fascinating talk in two parts, a tour of currently displayed Indigenous photographs, the selected images picked by Danger. The second part started with Guignard giving an overview of her research into Indigenous self-representation in photography, through the study of art catalogs and publications.  The event was capped off with a discussion between the two speakers.

The talk was revelatory, I was introduced to many Indigenous photo artists.  I am planning on updating the History of Photography course I teach at Algonquin College. I want to incorporating more international and Indigenous photographers.  This talk was a great primer into Indigenous photography.  The speakers had a vast knowledge of the subject.  They also picked a selection of catalogs and books from the Gallery’s archives which I have added to our purchase list at the Algonquin Library.

The talk also got me thinking about my own MA project.  Danger’s talk on the individual images and her peeling back the layers of the work was eye opening.  As an artist herself it was interesting to hear her perspective on the work and the lingo of a contemporary artist.  Some of the ideas and issues she discussed were new to me, others were explained so succinctly they clicked with me. The ideas of visual sovereignty/ownership, visual signifiers, and the gaze Dayna (2018).

The subject’s gaze in a photograph is something I had never  considered using to engage or provoke the audience Dayna (2018).  This technique is something I want to incorporate into the work.  Having the subjects project a strong gaze to engage the viewers to make them see the similarities in us all, regardless of race or culture.  The issue of visual sovereignty/ownership is interesting too.  What am I giving back to the subject and who owns the image.  Also what context should the image be see in, who, where and what is the audience?  Danger decoded some of the visual signifiers in the images she discussed, this is a layer that I never considered.  Should the visual signifiers in the work I am producing be explained, or should there be ones that only speak to certain migrant groups?

Figure 2: Dayna Danger and Sophie Guignard (Source: Machinski, 2018).  Answering questions from the group in the National Art Gallery Library after the talk.  

Figure 2: Dayna Danger and Sophie Guignard (Source: Machinski, 2018).  Answering questions from the group in the National Art Gallery Library after the talk.  

Guignard’s discussion on her methodology and her process allowed me to but into context my own process and methods.  It was an affirmation that what I am doing is correct.  I am at the point in my research that there is too much info and I need to focus.   Through talking about her research she helped put me back on track.  Guignard also had an interesting point about photography as relational text or object Guignard (2018).  That if you examine a photo you can unfold the space, time, meaning of the images and where they were taken Guignard (2018).  I want my work to act as relational objects.

Two of my concerns about my project and photography have been silenced, at least for a bit, thanks to this talk. One, what will the project add to the conversation?  Two, is photography as a medium the avenue to explore such topics, is it still a relevant medium? 

One of the Indigenous photographers that I really enjoyed was Shelley Niro.

Figure 3: Work of Peter Pitseolak (Source: Machinski, 2018).  Danger explained how the work of Peter Pitseolak was very improvised given that access to equipment was difficult up north.  His images are compositionally beautiful and his technique excellent. Machinski, 2018).

Figure 3: Work of Peter Pitseolak (Source: Machinski, 2018).  Danger explained how the work of Peter Pitseolak was very improvised given that access to equipment was difficult up north.  His images are compositionally beautiful and his technique excellent. Machinski, 2018).

Figure 4: Shelley Niro’s Landscapes (Source: Machinski, 2018). Niro's landscape work was brilliantly explained by Danger and how it fit into Indigenous Self-Representation.

Figure 4: Shelley Niro’s Landscapes (Source: Machinski, 2018). Niro's landscape work was brilliantly explained by Danger and how it fit into Indigenous Self-Representation.

Citations

Dayna, D. (2018) Museum talk with Dayna Danger. 19 April, 2018.

Guignard, S. (2018) Museum talk with Sophie Guignard. 19 April, 2018.

Machinski, J. (2018) Dayna Danger discussing work of Shelley Niro. April 2018. Unpublished. 

Machinski, J. (2018) Dayna Danger and Sophie Guignard. April 2018. Unpublished. 

Machinski, J. (2018) Work of Peter Pitseolak. April 2018. Unpublished. 

Machinski, J. (2018) Shelley Niro’s Landscapes. April 2018. Unpublished. 

tags: Research and Practice
categories: National Gallery Talk, Masters
Sunday 04.22.18
Posted by Jason Machinski
 

connect: talk@jasonmachinski.com

© 2018